华亿体育(中国)游戏平台华亿体育(中国)游戏平台

0571-87968248 CHINESE
  • Home
  • About us
    ProfileCultureHistory
  • News
    Company newsTrade showsIndustry news
  • Products
    COVID-19 IgG/IgM Rapid Test KitAllergen-specific IgE antibodies test kit seriesFood-specific IgG/IgG4 antibodies test seriesSingle/Polynomial allergen test seriesSingle allergen component test seriesGenetic test for allergic diseases series productsOther seriesProduct specific equipment
  • About allergies
    Scientific literaturePopular scienceVideos
  • Contact us
    Join usContact us
Scientific literaturePopular scienceVideos
Components literatureGene literatureMechanism literatureProbioticsTest literatureDesensitizationOther

Understanding differences in allergen immunotherapy products and practices in North America

Release date:2019-04-04

JACI                                                      
       [IF:13.1]
Understanding differences in allergen immunotherapy products and practices in North America
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jaci.2019.01.024
 Abstract:
Allergen immunotherapy (AIT) is thought to be clinically effective and safe in treating allergic rhinitis, asthma, and stinging insect allergy in Europe and North America. However, there are intercontinental differences in AIT therapeutic products in terms of their application and regulation. In North America unmodified standardized and nonstandardized aqueous aeroallergen extracts are approved and used almost exclusively for subcutaneous immunotherapy, whereas more product options are available in Europe, including adsorbed allergens, chemically modified allergens, or both. Both liquid extracts and tablets are approved for sublingual immunotherapy in Europe. Nevertheless, within the European Union, there are major differences in AIT products approved and used in individual countries. There are major differences in the clinical approach to subcutaneous immunotherapy in polysensitized patients; in the United States mixed extracts containing multiple aeroallergens are used, whereas European allergists preferably administer separate injections of single allergen sources or homologous groups deemed to be clinically relevant. Moreover, the regulatory approach differs between the European Union and United States. In contrast to the United States, where common allergen standards exist based on biologic activity, no common standards exist in Europe. In terms of development of new investigational products, the United States has followed the European example for phase II and III studies; no formal US Food and Drug Administration guidance has been issued.
All Author:
VeraMahlerMDaRobert E.EschPhDbJörgKleine-TebbeMDcWilliam J.LaveryMD, PhDdGregPlunkettPhDeStefanViethsPhDa∗David I.BernsteinMDd∗
 
 2019-3-27  review
  • Home
  • About us
  • News
  • Products
  • About allergies
  • Contact us
Hangzhou Zheda Dixun Biological Gene Engineering Co., Ltd.  Copyright    HZKC Technical support   浙ICP备14005341号   (浙)-非经营性-2019-0050
Address: Rm.201-209, Bldg.2, No.568 Binkang Rd., Binjiang Dist.      Tel: 0571-87968248-805     Website:www.martscope.com

COPYRIGHT©2003-2024 www.martscope.com CORPORATION. ALL RIGHTS RESERVED

Official WeChat

开云电子(中国)官方网站 | 华亿首页(中国)网页版 | 开云网页版 | 天博手机网页(中国)有限公司 | 千亿体育线上平台中国有限公司 | 米兰手机在线登入 | 米乐官方网页版 | 华亿网页版 | 三亿体育首页(中国)网站首页 |